View PDF (CA Natural Resources Agency)

In 2012 it’s hard to imagine as politically diverse a group of Senators and Representatives sharing the same platform and repeating the same message. There were 21 Democrats and Republicans, ranging from the most liberal of the liberal to the most conservative of the conservative, and they were all there to support commercial and recreational fishermen and to get the Magnuson Act back to where its original authors intended it to be, with a reasonable balance between commerce and conservation with an emphasis on keeping fishermen fishing. The paucity of research dollars – and the diversion of those too few dollars into Dr. Jane Lubchenco’s catch shares program – also received prominent play.

We have to add here that a significant number of those 21 federal lawmakers, and the other speakers as well, were calling for the removal of Dr. Lubchenco as the head of NOAA and refuting her agenda of “fewer boats, fewer fishermen and never enough fish.”

In statement after statement our elected officials were echoing the thought that, considering our fish stocks are in better shape than they’ve been in for over a generation, they were committed to retooling the Magnuson Act – and the federal fisheries management process – to stop the ongoing destruction of the traditional fisheries in U.S. waters. That was and remains the whole point of Keep Fishermen Fishing.

As a result of the 2010 Rally, there were eight pieces of Magnuson reform legislation debated inside the House Natural Resources Committee in late 2011 that could each help to keep fishermen fishing through 2012 and beyond. On March 21, 2012, organizers just about tripled the number of federal legislators who committed to tackling this reform initiative. Rally organizers say that’s a great foundation to build upon, but the job is still not yet accomplished and the commercial and recreational fishermen who have united to defend the coastal heritage will not be able to do so without the active support and participation of independent fishermen of every stripe.  In response, the foundation-funded environmental non-government organizations (ENGOs) and their ‘bought and paid for’ fishermen’s organizations have already started a counter-offensive based on distortions and half-truths.

Keep Fishermen Fishing is going to be an ongoing campaign. Currently, key organizers from both the recreational and commercial side are in the process of deciding how the ongoing campaign to reform Magnuson Stevens will be structured and how the initiative is going to proceed.

Those supporting national efforts to Keep Fishermen Fishing should check back to the group’s website (www.keepfishermenfishing.com <http://www.keepfishermenfishing.com/> ) regularly to keep up with the ongoing activities.  More importantly, the website will help let you find out how you can help by uniting with like-minded coastal fishermen.

Things have to change at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, at the National Marine Fisheries Service, in the regional fisheries management councils and in the Magnuson Stevens Act which controls them all. Those changes aren’t going to come about spontaneously.  We’re only going to make them by working together.

Jim Donofrio
Nils Stolpe

Thank You
scottseymour22@yahoo.com